Resources
Recent Legal Developments Regarding Abortion Access
(updated July 2024)
-
1. FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine was a Supreme Court case about access to mifepristone, a medication used for medication abortions. DRNY signed on to a disability amicus brief describing how restricting access to medication abortions would be harmful for people with disabilities. The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously decided to allow mifepristone to remain on the market. The court found that the Plaintiffs in the case, who sought to restrict access to mifepristone, did not have standing to challenge FDA regulations that limit medically unnecessary restrictions on mifepristone access, including restrictions that disproportionately affect people with disabilities. For more information about the case and how it affects people with disabilities, please see the statements by Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund and American Association of People with Disabilities, links available below.
-
4. Disability Rights & Reproductive Justice: Improving Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Access for People with Disabilities in a Post-Dobbs World, presentation and materials by Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund
-
5. DREDF Responds to Supreme Court’s Decision in Moyle v. United States (another case about abortion access that affects people with disabilities)
Pregnancy in the Workplace
EMPLOYMENT - REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION
EMPLOYER SPONSORED SHORT-TERM & LONG-TERM DISABILITY
EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION - FILING CLAIMS
EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION - FILING CLAIMS NYC
Reasonable Accommodations to Access Medical Care
REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION REQUESTS - SUPPORT FROM MEDICAL PROVIDERS
HEALTHCAREPROVIDERS’OBLIGATIONSTOPROVIDE SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS